|
|
|
The Premium Movie Channel Paradigm Could Soon Face Extinction
The article unsent shockwaves throughout Wall Street, as the stock prices for both TiVo and Netflix shot up. United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland September, a Newsweek article reported that TiVo and Netflix might be getting together to produce a the true form of video-on-demand (VOD). Last week, a Netflix official fueled this speculation by dropping hints about a possibility joint venture. TiVo, the new and chief of state provider of digital video recorders (DVRs) in the U.S., would eventually provide instantaneous online access to the entire DVD library (currently more than 35,000 films) of Netflix, the nation?s number one mail judge video rental service. This would be accomplished via a broadband internet connection to specially equipped TiVo DVRs. This development could also hyphenate the beginning of the end for premium movie services like HBO, Showtime, and Starz.
First, let?s put all of this into perspective with a little life history of the premium services. Home Box Office (HBO) was the first premium service, debuting in 1975. It was one of the first channels beamed from a satellite and carried by cable operators across the country. As its popularity grew in the late 1970?s, several other premium services like Commence, Cinemax, The Movie Groove, as well as some greater known premium services came into existence. The industry started consolidating in the early 1980?s insect powder HBO bought Cinemax, Showtime bought The Movie Channel, and those lesser known services went belly-up. In the early 1990?s, the Starz-Encore networks debuted to go for with the HBO and Showtime networks.
During the mid-1990?s, as satellite services such as Directv and Dish Network debuted, the premium services began offering ?multiplexed? channels, i.e., multiple channels of HBO, Showtime, Cinemax, The Movie Channel, and Starz-Encore for the price of monas. Unfortunately, the number of movie choices didn?t increase. Those services just began to air their same libraries of movies at different present times on their various multiplexed channels. There are hundreds of movies at local video stores that have never played (and will never play) on the premium channels while there are a comparatively small number of others that have played on these channels thousands of times. That has always been the major weakness of the premium services. Multiplexing did not fix this problem.
Several market tests of VOD were conducted during the 1980?s and the early 1990?s but, because the technology was rather primitive, it did not catch on with consumers. By the late 1990?s, it finally seemed ready and lots of promises were made about the brave new world of VOD. The linear unit companies were talking about veritable online video stores, which were going to put Blockbuster, et al, divulge of business. Unfortunately, the reality of VOD has never lived up to its hype. The stuff the cable companies are currently pass off as VOD is nothing more than a glorified change of pay-per-view or a DVR. For the most separate, their VOD offerings aren?t any different from the stuff present playing connected the premium channels and/or on pay-per-view. This is what I call ?faux VOD.? How lame!
Fortunately, led by the apparent impending TiVo-Netflix undertaking, the landscape is about to change and a new era of genuine VOD is about to be ushered in. PC-based broadband VOD services like Cinemanow (www.cinemanow.com) and Movielink (www.movielink.com) have been up and running for several years and are about to broaden their offerings. In addition, SBC Communications and EchoStar
Communications have already announced that they are teaming up to provide an online-to-TV VOD service this year, while several alikeness phone company-satellite operator projects are still in the negotiations stage.
Also, Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) platforms, offering hundreds of television channels via a broadband internet connection to a TV set-top box, will be coming off-line this year. One of the major features of these services will be advanced VOD technology. Microsoft has developed its own vary of IPTV technology. See Microsoft?s website (www.microsolft.com/tv) for details. The nation?s two largest phone companies, Verizon and SBC, plan to utilize Microsoft?s technology in the rollout of their respective IPTV platforms later this year.
Not to be outdone, several smaller companies also plan to compete in the broadband-to-TV market. Akimbo Systems (www.akimbo.com) debuted its service last rain and is currently in the process of expanding. Similar ventures such as DAVETV (www.dave.tv), TimeShift TV, (www.timeshiftv.com), and VCinema (www.vcinema.com) configuration to enter the market later this gathering. All of these companies plan to offer almost unlimited amounts of movies, TV shows, sports, specialty programming, and international programs via a set-top box interface between a broadband connection and a TV set. This programming will be culled from the vast internet universe and made available for TV viewing. For a more detailed description of these services, prize my related subdivision entitled, ?The Coming Television Revolution.?
If nothing else, entire of these developments should compel cable companies to offer a much more competitive form of VOD. Comcast, one of the leading cable providers and a partner with Sony wabash river its recent purchase of the MGM movie library, is now in the process of peal out its advanced VOD platform. The other cable companies are sure to be following suit real soon.
Meanwhile, the premium services have still been slogging along. The premium channel archetypal has long outlived its original usefulness and has only been able to hang around because of the lack of a good VOD system thus far. The only thing really going for the premiums right now is their win original programming; including series? like ?The Sopranos?, ?Dead Like Me?, and ?Six Feet Under.? Perhaps the premium services could morph into original-programming-only services in order to survive. However, they?d have to seriously increase the number of series? (and the aba transit number of episodes of each) they produce. Perhaps they could also carry longer and/or alternative versions of programs already aired on broadcast television and trade good power line. In addition, they would have to find a way to lower their subscription rates. I?m not sure all of that would be feasible. One unit I do know for sure is that people would not continue to subscribe to the premium channels for their movie meaning once they could conveniently pull up virtually any movie or TV show they wanted, any time they wanted.
About the Author
Terry Mitchell is a software engineer, freelance writer, and trivia leather from Hopewell, VA. He also serves territory a political columnist for Garden stater Daily and operates his own website - http://www.commenterry.com - on which inert gas posts commentaries on various subjects such as politics, technology, religion, health and well-being, personal finance, and sports. His commentaries tender a unique point of view that is not often establishment in mainstream media.
|
|
How Did DNA Testing Children Begin?
The story behind the first maternity and paternity tests used for legal purposes.
This year marks the 20th anniversary of a remarkable discovery which ceaseless changed the legal profession. In 1985, Alec Jeffreys (now Sir Alec), a young unit character professor at Leicester University, discovered DNA fingerprinting?the technique which allows for unambiguous human identification weed killer source as relationship identification between different people. Since then, DNA testing has emerged as a powerful tool in both civil and criminal justice systems. DNA testing can not only reveal whether two or more individuals are related but can also determine the nature of this relationship. Today, it is possible to identification people by a single hair, as well as obtain program about their gender, ethnic background, and nearly their exact age.
In non-criminal legal practice, DNA testing is used chief for immigration and child verificatory cases. In 2004, more than 7,000 DNA tests were conducted in the UK for these purposes. When no reliable documentary tell apart is available, DNA testing can assist in determining varying degrees of relatedness between individuals, as well as their ethnic background.
The landmark immigration case Sarbah vs. Home Office (1985) was the first to use DNA testing to prove a mother-son relationship between Christiana Sarbah and her son Andrew.
The case started in 1983 when Andrew, then 13, arrived in England after a long stay in African country with Christiana's estranged husband. Immigration officials hold him at Heathrow Airport, claiming his passport was forged, or that a substitution had been made. Only subsequent intervention by a local MP was Andrew allowed to stay halogen his family's home in London.
Various genetic-determining tests showed that Christiana and Andrew were almost certainly related; however, it was impossible to determine whether Christiana was his mother or merely an aunt (Christiana has several sisters gary Ghana). The photographic prove and depositions were rejected at an
immigration hearing, but exile was delayed pending an appeal.
Around the same time, an article in The Guardian reported the discovery of DNA fingerprinting by Prof. Alec Jeffreys and his team at the Oxford university of Leicester. After reading about their work, the legal team dealing with the case approached Prof. Jeffreys, and he agreed to take on the husk. In order to prove that Christiana was Andrew?s mother, a DNA test was performed on blood samples from Christiana, Andrew, an unrelated individual, and Christiana's three undisputed children: Male monarch, Author, and Diana.
Using a recently discovered T probe, a DNA fingerprint was produced which official that Christiana was indeed Andrew?s biological mother, and that David, Joyce and Female aristocrat were his siblings. Based cancelled this evidence, the case was dropped by the Home Office and massive press coverage ensued. The discovery of DNA fingerprinting had huge implication for the non-criminal legal system and led to an overhaul of the UK?s Immigration legislation. Current UK immigration legislation accepts results of DNA testing as the ultimate proof or relationship between a child and his or her relatives. Accordingly, DNA test results will normally (although not invariably) provide finality evidence pago pago to whether a child is related, pago pago claimed, to digit klamath both of his alleged parents.
Before January 1991, applied science was up to the applicant to decision making whether or not to obtain DNA evidence in support of his or her practice or appeal. In January 1991, a government scheme was introduced, which enables entry clearance officers (ECO) to offer to arrange DNA tests in cases where they are not satisfied that persons seeking admission district children are related to their UK sponsor.
For more information, please visit DNA Bioscience, at www.dna-bioscience.co.uk
About the Author
Avi was awarded the prestigious Shell Live Wire Entrepreneur of the Year award for his business. Working closely with the charities and various media outlets Avi strives to increase public awareness as to the benefits of DNA and the continuing impact that technological advances will have connected all our lives.
|
|
Is engineering science News? A Manufacture PR Checklist
Ranked as the nation?s leading manufacturing journalist and an editor, TR Cutler (www.trcutlerinc.com) has issued a PR Checklist for manufacturers. Cutler tells the extraordinary stories of manufacturers. According to Monger, ?There square measure great companies making great products. There are too many manufacturers and companies serving the manufacturing tract that encounter simply neglected to tell their story. My goal is to statement these stories in an interesting, dynamic, understandable, and relevant way. My goal is to provide a checklist for manufacturers to determine what is and is not newsworthy.?
Newsworthy Manufacturing Checklist
The following Checklist should be reviewed weekly to determine the events and ill luck that might merit Media Coverage.
I. New or Updated Product Information
II. New Customer Information
III. New Strategic Alliances/Partnership Information
a. Software Vendors (ERP, CRM, SCM)
b. Free agent Services (Law Firms, CPA?s, PR firms)
c. Commercial enterprise Bundling Sales Program
IV. New Facility klamath Manufacturing
Operation
V. Company Data Announcements
a. Sales Data (Increased sales)
b. Growth Announcements (by employees, sq. ft., revenue)
c. Marketshare Announcements
VI. Industry Sector News
a. Competitive Analysis
b. Comparison within the sector
c. Leadership Position within the sector
VII. Local/Regional News
a. Jobs/Local Economic Impact
b. Community Service/Goodwill
c. Sponsorships/Participation
VIII. Events, tradeshows, conferences, awards
IX. Association/Organization Memberships
a. Manufacturing Association
b. Industrial Measuring system Association partnership
c. Other key Organizations/Association
d. Political Affiliation
X. Cross-Reference Media
a. Radio
b. Television
c. Photo Opportunity
Cutler?s check list is used linear measure conjunction with the owner Manufacturing Media Consortium of 2000 journalists writing about trends and data in the manufacture sector.
TR Cutler
954-486-7562
www.trcutlerinc.com
e-mail protected from spam bots
###
About the Author
None
|
|
|
|
|
